Vikane Gas Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Vikane Gas - Essay Example fectively decimates creepy crawlies at all the dynamic phases of life, though it must be regulated in higher dosages or for longer times of presentation to kill bug eggs. It is an exceptionally poisonous gas, which goes about as a focal sensory system depressant; and high focuses can prompt respiratory disappointment. The scentless, drab gas has no admonition qualities (Kamrin 1997) henceforth it contains the aggravation chloropicrin as a notice pointer. Theory Statement: The motivation behind this paper is to research the properties, capacities, utilizes, poisonous impacts, and different components of Vikane Gas or Sulfuryl Fluoride. The identification strategies and treatment for nerve gases will likewise be inspected. Altogether, sulfuryl fluoride is authorized for use in a few nations, which is a significant thought in expanding the utilization of the fumigant in postharvest control innovation. It is as of now enrolled as a basic fumigant, â€Å"and might be compelling as a general ware disinfestation treatment and as an isolate treatment† (Zettler and Arthur 2000, p.581). In food premises putting away grains the fumigant is utilized cautiously in light of its harmfulness. Further, it is utilized as an isolate treatment for dried leafy foods where control of the open minded egg stage need not be mulled over; as in wrecking a pervasion of C. pomonella on pecans and A. transitella on almonds. Sulfuryl fluoride has the most reduced breaking point of any fumigant, - 55.20C, and consequently is in the vaporous state under all down to earth fumigation conditions. The introduction courses are principally through inward breath and through the skin. Vikane gas, a Restricted Use Pesticide is in a pressurized condition in a steel chamber from which it is administered through a hose into the inside of the fixed structure. After the slip by of a timeframe, when air levels of sulfuryl fluoride have brought down to 1 section for each million (ppm) or less, the inside of the structure is circulated air through. The Hazard Evaluation Division (HED)

M2 Compare the Effectiveness of Different Teams

Amy Waldock Amy Waldock M2 analyze the viability of various groups Clarifying items in my group we explained destinations by tuning in to the group chief and the man responsible for the exercises at Blacklands homestead and asking him inquiries about the exercises to ensure that everybody completely comprehended everything.Compared to my group in the scaffold building challenge we tuned in to the group head and posed inquiries significantly more so consequently the work done at Blacklands ranch was much increasingly effective. Concurring assignments at Blacklands ranch we conceded to the errands by speaking with each colleague to get everyone’s perspective to ensure that everybody got a state in to what they thought, by doing this it implied that everybody in the group conceded to the way to deal with the task.Sometimes somebody would differ with a thought which could cause strife in the gathering, we managed this by taking a vote and going with what was casted a ballot the mo st. While doing the scaffold building challenge on the grounds that my gathering just comprised of three individuals there was less clash in the gathering since it was simpler for us to concur on the assignment, it was additionally simpler in light of the fact that we had a group head so we just obliged what he said.Valuing individuals esteeming individuals was significant at Blacklands ranch on the grounds that the errands set were full on and truly hard so it was basic that each colleague was esteemed as an individual and included in light of the fact that with undertakings, for example, the spider’s web all of help was required. Despite the fact that the scaffold building challenge wasn’t as physical it was still significant that each colleague was esteemed similarly on the grounds that the assignment included a great deal of focus and strategic skills.Being responsive to input at Blacklands ranch we carried out a responsibility that we bombed on various occasions s o our group chief halted us and gave us criticism on what we was doing well and what we was fouling up and what we could do to finish the undertaking all the more rapidly and without any problem. Me and my group tuned in to our group head and were responsive to his criticism and did as he said and to further our potential benefit finished the task.When doing the extension building challenge we were given input on methods of how to finish the test all the more rapidly and effectively, shockingly me and my gathering didn't focus on the criticism and in this way our scaffold was not finished in time. Keeping up center keeping up center at Blacklands ranch was significant for a great deal of the errands in such a case that center was lost it could influence the entire group and cause a specific assignment to come up short, on occasion it was difficult to keep up a center in light of chilly climate and sloppy conditions.To keep up a center we arranged as a gathering and were persuaded by our group chief and colleagues. It was difficult to keep up a center while doing the extension building challenge for my gathering on the grounds that on occasion each colleague would get disappointed when things weren’t going as arranged, we kept up a concentration by thinking about the prize that could be won to whoevers scaffold could hold the most measure of paste sticks.Encouraging other colleagues to suggest upgrades this was significant at Blacklands ranch provided that there was something in the errand that wasn’t going to design it could be improved and improved of the gathering. While doing the scaffold building challenge it wasn’t as critical to urge a colleague to suggest enhancements on the grounds that there was just three individuals in our gathering and we decided on who ought to be group pioneer so we was sure that who we had picked recognized what was correct so we went with what they said.Dealing with struggle at Blacklands ranch in light of the fact that my group worked very well together so there was not really any contention, yet in the event that there was strife we managed this by examining the issue all together and afterward talking about what might be the best way to deal with the issue and if essentially to take a vote. On the off chance that there was any contention while doing the scaffold building challenge we managed this by giving the issue fall access to the group heads hand and letting them choose the best alternative for the gathering, by doing this it stayed away from more conflict.Communication techniques at Blacklands ranch we conveyed by posing inquiries to ensure that everything was secured thus that everybody had a decent comprehension of the assignment, we likewise tuned in to each colleague when they addressed keep up a decent correspondence inside the entire group. Now and again we utilized non-verbal communication to speak with colleagues by utilizing articulations as approval and disapproval to demonstrate yes or no.We likewise needed to utilize non-verbal communication in one undertaking where we were approached to get in a line as indicated by birth date yet without talking so in this errand we utilized our hands to show numbers. Not at all like at Blacklands ranch while doing the extension building challenge we weren’t requested to do anything without talking so non-verbal communication wasn’t as vital, we despite everything needed to continually pose inquiries and tune in to colleagues to keep up a decent relationship in the group and to ensure that correspondence was kept up. M2 Compare the Effectiveness of Different Teams Amy Waldock Amy Waldock M2 analyze the viability of various groups Clarifying items in my group we explained goals by tuning in to the group chief and the man responsible for the exercises at Blacklands ranch and asking him inquiries about the exercises to ensure that everybody completely comprehended everything.Compared to my group in the scaffold building challenge we tuned in to the group head and posed inquiries significantly more so in this way the work done at Blacklands ranch was much progressively effective. Concurring errands at Blacklands ranch we conceded to the assignments by speaking with each colleague to get everyone’s perspective to ensure that everybody got a state in to what they thought, by doing this it implied that everybody in the group concurred on the way to deal with the task.Sometimes somebody would differ with a thought which could cause struggle in the gathering, we managed this by taking a vote and going with what was casted a ballot the most. Whil e doing the scaffold building challenge in light of the fact that my gathering just comprised of three individuals there was less clash in the gathering since it was simpler for us to concede to the errand, it was likewise simpler on the grounds that we had a group chief so we just obliged what he said.Valuing individuals esteeming individuals was significant at Blacklands ranch in light of the fact that the assignments set were full on and truly hard so it was fundamental that each colleague was esteemed as an individual and included on the grounds that with undertakings, for example, the spider’s web all of help was required. Despite the fact that the scaffold building challenge wasn’t as physical it was still significant that each colleague was esteemed similarly in light of the fact that the undertaking included a great deal of fixation and strategic skills.Being open to criticism at Blacklands ranch we carried out a responsibility that we bombed on various occasio ns so our group chief halted us and gave us input on what we was doing well and what we was fouling up and what we could do to finish the errand all the more rapidly and without any problem. Me and my group tuned in to our group chief and were responsive to his criticism and did as he said and to further our potential benefit finished the task.When doing the scaffold building challenge we were given input on methods of how to finish the test all the more rapidly and effectively, lamentably me and my gathering didn't focus on the input and in this manner our extension was not finished in time. Keeping up center keeping up center at Blacklands ranch was significant for a ton of the errands supposing that center was lost it could influence the entire group and cause a specific undertaking to come up short, now and again it was difficult to keep up a center in light of chilly climate and sloppy conditions.To keep up a center we arranged as a gathering and were persuaded by our group hea d and colleagues. It was difficult to keep up a center while doing the scaffold building challenge for my gathering in light of the fact that on occasion each colleague would get disappointed when things weren’t going as arranged, we kept up a concentration by thinking about the prize that could be won to whoevers extension could hold the most measure of paste sticks.Encouraging other colleagues to suggest enhancements this was significant at Blacklands ranch in such a case that there was something in the errand that wasn’t going to design it could be improved and improved of the gathering. While doing the extension building challenge it wasn’t as critical to urge a colleague to suggest upgrades in light of the fact that there was just three individuals in our gathering and we decided on who ought to be group pioneer so we was certain that who we had picked comprehended what was correct so we went with what they said.Dealing with strife at Blacklands ranch in li ght of the fact that my group worked very well together so there was not really any contention, yet in the event that there was struggle we managed this by examining the issue all together and afterward talking about what might be the best way to deal with the issue and if fundamentally to take a vote. On the off chance that there was any contention while doing the scaffold building challenge we managed this by giving the issue fall access to the group chiefs hand and letting them choose the best choice for the gathering, by doing this it stayed away from more conflict.Communication strategies at Blacklands ranch we conveyed by posing inquiries to ensure that everything was secured thus that everybody had a decent comprehension of the assignment, we additionally tuned in to each colleague when they addressed keep up a decent correspondence inside the entire group. Now and again we utilized non-verbal communication to speak with colleagues by utilizing articulations as approval and d isapproval to demonstrate yes or no.We additionally needed to utilize non-verbal communication in one undertaking where we were approached to get in a line as per birth date yet without talking so in this assignment we utilized our hands to show numbers. Not at all like at Blacklands ranch while doing the extension building challenge we weren’t requested to do anything mind

Will Closing a Credit Card Affect Your Credit Score

Will Closing a Credit Card Affect Your Credit Score Will Closing a Credit Card Affect Your Credit Score? Will Closing a Credit Card Affect Your Credit Score?It might seem odd, but closing a credit card can actually hurt your score, especially if its one of your oldest cards and/or carries a high credit limit.There are a lot of myths out there surrounding credit scores and credit-related topics. But sometimes a thing that sounds like an urban legend turns out to be true! If you’re skeptical that closing a credit card could hurt your credit score, well, you’re in for a bit of a shock.Yes, it will affect themâ€"probably for the worse.Credit scores are complicated, with a number of factors coming together to make up that single three-digit number. There are many different things you can do to hurt your score and many things you can do to help it. Plus, context matters.If you have multiple credit cards and cancel a card with a modest credit limit that youve only had for a couple of years, there may be very little impact on your credit score,” said Timothy G. Wiedman, professor emeritus of Management and Human Resources at  Doane University (@DoaneUniversity).“On the other hand,” he added, “if you only have two or three credit cards and cancel your oldest card that youve had for a dozen years that had a $15,000 credit limit (and that was the card with your highest limit), it may matter quite a bit.”So what gives?“Credit scores take into account how long youve had your credit card accounts and the percentage of your total credit limits that you utilize,” explained Wiedman. “So if you cancel your oldest account (especially if it has a healthy credit limit), it can matter a lotâ€"especially if you only have one or two other (much newer) cards.”How credit scores work.In this piece, we cover two different parts of your credit score at length. We don’t want you getting lost, so here’s a brief refresher on how credit scores work.Your FICO credit scoreâ€"created by the FICO companyâ€"is a three-digit number between 300 and 850. The higher your score, t he better your credit.FICO credit scores are based on information taken from your credit reports, which track your history as a borrower and user of credit over the past seven years. (Some information, however, will stay on your report for longer.)You score is made up of five different categories of information:Payment history: This makes up 35 percent of your score. Basically, do you pay your bills on time?Amounts borrowed/credit utilization: This makes up 30 percent of your score, and it tracks how much money you’ve borrowed.Length of credit history: This makes up 15 percent of your score. The longer you’ve been borrowing money, and the longer you’ve had revolving accounts (like credit cards) open, the better.Credit mix: 10 percent of your score. What different types of credit (credit cards vs personal loans vs home/auto loans vs student loans) do you have? A more diverse mix is better.New credit inquiries: 10 percent of your score. Have you recently made a bunch of inquirie s for new loans or lines of credit? If you have, maybe that’s a sign that you’re desperate to borrow more money …If you have bad credit and you want to know why, you should order a free copy of your credit report, which you can do by visiting AnnualCreditReport.com. To find out where you need to do better, look at your payment history and your credit utilization. Together, they make up 65 percent of your total score.Closing a card hurts your credit utilization ratio.Whether you get stung when you close a credit card account depends on a measurement known as the balance-to-limit ratio or credit utilization ratio. This compares how much credit is available to you to how much credit you actually borrow,” explained Stephen Hart, CEO of  Cardswitcher.A high balance-to-limit ratio, where you borrow a large amount of money, is usually considered a sign of increased financial risk by lenders and a low balance-to-limit ratio is considered good.”Still not sure how your credit utiliz ation ratio works? Here’s an example from CPA Logan Allec  (@moneydoneright), owner of personal finance website  Money Done Right:“Lets say you have a total credit balance of $4,000 across all your credit cards.  Now lets say you have a total credit limit across all of your credit cards of $20,000. In this case, your total utilization rate is 20 percentâ€"or $4,000 divided by $20,000.“Now, what if one of your credit cards has a $10,000 credit limit, and you cancel it? In this case, your total credit limit across all of your credit cards would go down to $10,000. What would happen to your total utilization rate?  It would skyrocket to 40 percentâ€"or $4,000 divided by $10,000, which could adversely affect your credit score.”For the sake of your credit score, it’s best to keep your credit utilization ratio below 30 percent. Even if you’re paying off your cards every month, you should try to avoid accruing more than 30 percent of your total limit at any one moment in time .And if you’re thinking about closing that one card that has a super high credit limit, maybe don’t.Closing old cards dings your credit history.Remember, the length of your credit history doesn’t just measure how long you’ve been using credit, it also tracks how long you’ve been using specific accounts. The longer you’ve had a credit card, the more it helps your score.“While its not as weighty a factor as payment history or credit utilization,” says Allec, “its still worth paying attention to.” And he’s right! Closing your oldest card will lower the average age of your accounts, likely dropping your score.“This is why I keep my oldest credit cardâ€"the one I opened in collegeâ€"open,” added Allec. “Even though I dont use it because its rewards structure is a boring one percent back on everything.”And if you’re not certain which of your credit cards is the oldest, Allec offered this tip: “Make a list of all of them and see if you can see online which one is the oldest based on their statement dates.”Looking to erase past mistakes? Not so fast. One of the reasons that someone might look to close an old card is because they think it will remove any bad information related to that card from their report.Unfortunately, it will not.Bear in mind that the credit card isnt erased from your credit record straight away,” said Hart. “Negative entries usually stay on your credit record for around seven yearsâ€"so it isnt necessarily a quick fix for making your credit history appear rosier than it actually is.”“The good news,” he added, “is that positive entries stay on your credit record for much longerâ€"usually a decade.Keep them openâ€"just don’t use them.As you can see, the reasons for keeping an old card open are generally more compelling than the reasons to close it. Still, in case you’re not convinced, here are a couple more common reasons that people close their old credit cardsâ€"and ways that you can get around them:“If your newer cards provide better reward deals, just use them as your main cards while using the older, longstanding card once in a while to keep that account active (and keeping its high credit limit as part of your credit file),” said Wiedman.“If you have high balances on other credit cards, you might find that youre faced with charges when you try to close your credit card account. A way to avoid this to make sure that you pay off the balances of all your accounts in full before you try to close any,” offered Hart.“If your reason for wanting to cancel a credit card is its high annual fee, call the credit card company to see if they will waive it for the year,” advised Allec.Just make sure you don’t do one thing, and that’s to start using the card to spend beyond your means and rack up excess debt! To learn more about managing your debts responsibly, check out these other posts and articles from OppLoans:Financial Priorities: Which Debts Should You Pay Off F irst?The Debt Avalanche Will Help You Pay off Debt for LessSo You’ve Maxed out Your Credit Cards … Now What?Student Loans: To Pay or Just to SaveDo you have a   personal finance question youd like us to answer? Let us know! You can find us  on  Facebook  and  Twitter.  |  InstagramContributorsLogan Allec (@moneydoneright) is a CPA and owner of the personal finance website  Money Done Right.    After spending his twenties grinding it out in the corporate world and paying off over $35,000 in student loans, he dropped everything and launched  Money Done Right  in 2017.    His mission is to help everybodyâ€"from college students to retireesâ€"make, save, and invest more money.    Logan resides in the Los Angeles area with his wife Caroline.After working in the financial industry for several years, Stephen Hart left his role as Chief Financial Officer at WorldPay to launch the UK’s first payment processing comparison site, Cardswitcher. Nowadays, he helps SMEs save money on their p ayment processing costs.After 13 years as a successful operations manager working at two different ‘Fortune 1000’ companies, Dr. Timothy G. Wiedman spent the next 28 years in academia teaching college courses in business, management, human resources, and retirement planning.  Dr. Wiedman recently took an early retirement from  Doane University (@DoaneUniversity), is a member of the Human Resources Group of West Michigan and continues to do annual volunteer work for the SHRM Foundation. He holds two graduate degrees in business and has completed multiple professional certifications.

Key people in American History MLK and Malcolm X - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 4 Words: 1214 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/03/25 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Malcolm X Essay Did you like this example? After the end of the Civil War and the era of the Reconstruction of the South, the Southern states of the United States were gradually able to legally restrict the rights of black people in what is known as Jim Crow laws. This is how the policy of racial segregation appeared: the white people distanced themselves from blacks in all aspects of daily life. As a result, African Americans had their own schools, shops, cafes, railroad cars, and even places in public transport. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Key people in American History: MLK and Malcolm X" essay for you Create order Even the ability to vote was limited: the right to elect and be elected was closely tied to educational and property qualifications. Of course, such social pressure could not but provoke protests that grew as the standard of living and education of black people increased. The most famous and influential leaders of 1960s were Martin Luther King the face of the Civil rights movement who was a fighter for the rights of blacks in US history and Malcolm X a human rights activist and an American Muslim minister, who became a self-dedicated defender of African-Americans. Both Martin and Malcolm were deeply spiritual men and religious leaders; however, they belonged to different religious communities. The contribution to the course of history and the methodology of both speakers are going to be introduced in this essay. To start with, Martin Luther King led to many civil disobedience struggles as well as served as a strategist, theorist and symbol maker for the numerous movements. During the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom on the 28th of August 1963, Martin Luther King delivered a speech I have a dream to the civil rights marchers around the Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC. He decided to tell his speech there to remind about Abraham Lincolns proclamation which freed slaves in the Southern states. One of the Martin Luther Kings main aims was to inspire people and create a world where everyone would be equal. In this speech, Martin Luther King said: I have a dream that white and black children would one day walk hand in hand and that one day sons of former slaves and sons of former slaveowners would be able to agree to live together . He was not afraid of expressing his point of view about the better future that he wished to see, and the most important that it is possible to make his dream come true. Another strong example is a quote I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed we hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. Similar to the previous quote he supports an idea by telling about the progress of the U.S. nation and by referencing to the equality of all humanity. Another dramatic and influential figure was Malcolm X, who defended the rights of African Americans. In one of his speeches, called The Ballot or the Bullet, he motivated the audience to become more determined in the fight for civil rights, as well as he was calling for Black Nationalism. Consequently, after this speech, he was identified as a menacing character by the majority of white people. Also, he emphasized his religion in order to tell the audience that besides being a Muslim he is speaking to all humanity, not just to the Muslim community. It goes without saying that African Americans all over the country had the same feelings about being discriminated. The quote Today is time to stop singing and stop swinging. I speak as a victim of Americas so-called democracy. You and I have never seen democracy, all weve seen is hypocrisy. So, I m not standing here speaking to you as an American, or a patriot, or a flag-saluter, or a flag-waver no, not I. I m speaking as a victim of t his American system, represents his attitude on politics and a sarcastic note about so-called democracy shows the real situation in the U.S. of that period. Malcolm X emphasized being a victim of this system and was calling for taking actions against it. To sum up, though the speech The Ballot or the Bullet he motivated millions of people to fight for their rights and gave a needed support. In spite of the fact that both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X had the same aim to reach acceptance of black people, their methodologies were completely different. Malcolm X, in contradistinction to Martin Luther King, was not a priest. Even though they were a part of different religious communities, for both serving peoples everyday needs was a part of every aspect of their lives. Obviously, the influence of both was very effective. Malcolm X was a man who was never afraid to speak against injustice, he was not afraid of having enemies not only among racists and the Nation of Islam but also among the US ruling elite. Even despite some limitations of his ideas, Malcolm X is one of the most honest and uncompromising fighters for the rights of the black population of the United States of America. Malcolm X argued that Kings goal was to forgive white people who act violently, and he claimed that now African-Americans did not support Martin Luther King. King did not consider violence as a solution at all. During one interview Martin Luther King told the press that the method of non-violent resistance is one of the most potent, if not the most potent weapons available to oppressed people and their struggle for freedom.. He felt that killing is a very tragic way to deal with any social problem and there is no violent solution that the Negro confronts in this country. King sounded like a nonviolent Malcolm while second was inflexible about self-defense of black people and wage their struggle for freedom. Malcolms idea can be described by the concept of an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth ¦.and a life for a life. In contrast to Kings call for forgiving love, Malcolm anticipates an even-handed justice. The rights movement for supporting African-Americans was very huge and diverse. Both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X eventually worked for the same goal, however using absolutely different methods for reaching it. As Malcolm X said, Dr. King wants the same thing I wantfreedom!. All in all, they completely changed American society. The march on Washington, organized by Martin Luther King in 1963, really woke the whole country. After his influence, the segregated black population of the United States felt like equal people, whose opinion is being counted. During his lifetime, King became a powerful social symbol while Malcolms acknowledgment occurred after his death in early 1965 after publishing his powerful and established Autobiography, collected and written by a journalist Alex Haley. This spiritual conversion is based on a series of detailed interviews that he conducted between 1963 and Malcolms death and outlines Malcolm Xs philosophy of black nationalism. All in all, these two figures were the most effective and lasting voices of the civil rights movements. King encouraged to nonviolent resistance, Malcolm advocated self-defense; however, both struggled against the same injustice and contributed their lives to this fight. Their dedication eagerness to change the country still makes a huge impact on society.

Glaucon in the Republic - 1047 Words

In Platos Republic, Glaucon is introduced to the reader as a man who loves honor, sex, and luxury. As The Republic progresses through books and Socrates arguments of how and why these flaws make the soul unhappy began to piece together, Glaucon relates some of these cases to his own life, and begins to see how Socrates line of reasoning makes more sense than his own. Once Glaucon comes to this realization, he embarks on a path of change on his outlook of what happiness is, and this change is evidenced by the way he responds during he and Socrates discourse. The first change in character begins with Glaucons position on whether or not the unjust soul is happier than the just soul. This is seen in Book 4, 445b, when he argues†¦show more content†¦Glaucons statement indicates fear Ââ€" he worries about going back down to the cave or, returning to his former ignorance. This shows that Glaucon has not only embraced the idea of the cave, differing from his initial confusion, but he has also realized and accepted the truth and reasoning of Socrates. He has become the cave dweller who has been given the chance to escape, and he now fears going back. The next example of Glaucons transformation is during Book 9, 576e, when he states that there is no city more wretched than one ruled by a tyrantÂ…. Socrates is discussing how the four types of inferior souls bring about the ruin of the city. He then poses to Glaucon the question of whether a city ruled by a tyrant or philosopher-king is happier, in which he compels Glaucon to examine the whole of the city, and not just one or a few people who are a part of it, (or, the whole of the soul and not just one part over the exclusion of others). Glaucons response demonstrates that he now sees that the one who possesses power and riches is, in reality, is unhappy than the one who possesses knowledge and truth of self and the forms. He is answering his own question that he introduced in Book 2, and his answer is that the most just man, who is the philosopher-king in this dialogue, is happiest. The unjust man, being the tyrant, is unhappiest. This is expanded when Glaucon ranks the five actors in accordance to their contentment as heShow MoreRelatedThe Republic, Socrates And Glaucon1244 Words   |  5 PagesYezhen Li Professor David Goldman Philosophy 1300 11 September 2014 First Paper In sections 433-445 of The Republic , Socrates and Glaucon discuss about definitions and properties of both justice and injustice, with reference to the structure and condition of an ideal city with absolute justice. Considering the properties of justice and injustice, they conclude that just lives, even without anything desirable, are better than any other unjust lives. To start off, Socrates discusses about a justRead MoreThe Life Of Plato s Republic, Glaucon And Adeimantus1410 Words   |  6 Pages In Book II of Plato’s Republic, Glaucon and Adeimantus present a challenge to Socrates’ view of justice. Previously, in Book I of the Republic, Socrates presents several counterarguments to Thrasymachus’ belief that it is to your own advantage to practice injustice rather than to follow laws, if you can get away with it (Babcock). Glaucon and Adeimantus sought to present a stronger defense to Thrasymachus’ view. The main viewpoint they try to establish is that it is to our advantage to practiceRead MoreWhat Is Glaucon s Argument On The Republic? Do You Find It Persuasive?1751 Words   |  8 PagesWhat is Glaucon’s argument in the Republic? Do you find it persuasive? Give reasons for your answer. Glaucon’s argument in book II of Republic concerns the issue of justice. From the outset Glaucon explains that justice is a social contract that emerges - between people who are roughly equal in power - for the reason being that the pain of experiencing unjust actions is greater than the benefits accrued from inflicting it. (Plato, 2008) In this essay I will first outline his argument and explainRead More Platos Republic Essay1025 Words   |  5 PagesPlatos Republic In Plato’s Republic, Glaucon is introduced to the reader as a man who loves honor, sex, and luxury. As The Republic progresses through books and Socrates’ arguments of how and why these flaws make the soul unhappy began to piece together, Glaucon relates some of these cases to his own life, and begins to see how Socrates’ line of reasoning makes more sense than his own. Once Glaucon comes to this realization, he embarks on a path of change on his outlook of what happiness isRead MoreSocrates Virtuous Soul Analysis1234 Words   |  5 PagesThis philosophy study will argue against Socrates’ â€Å"virtuous soul† as the motivation for just acts in The Republic. Socrates’ argument for the â€Å"balanced soul† as a motivation for just acts is defined in relation to the contrasting arguments of his contemporaries, such as Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus. This ideological view of the â€Å"virtuous soul† does not provide a pract ical explanation for the motivation of a â€Å"just act† in a hierarchical society. The argument of Thrasymachus defines justiceRead MoreThe Republic Does Justice Pay Essay548 Words   |  3 PagesThe Republic Does Justice Pay In the Introduction of Platos Republic, a very important theme is depicted. It is the argument of whether it is beneficial for a person to lead a good and just existence. The greatly argued position that justice does not pay, is argued by three men Thrasymachus, Glaucon, and Adeimantus. By incorporating all three men into a collective effort I believe I can give a more flattering depiction of injustice. First, we must explore the basis of the moral skepticismRead MoreEssay about Plato1268 Words   |  6 Pagese.).[6] Besides Plato himself, Ariston and Perictione had three other children; these were two sons, Adeimantus and Glaucon, and a daughter Potone, the mother of Speusippus (the nephew and successor of Plato as head of his philosophical Academy).[6] According to the Republic, Adeimantus and Glaucon were older than Plato.[7] Nevertheless, in his Memorabilia, Xenophon presents Glaucon as younger than Plato.[8] According to certain reports of ancient writers, Plato s mother became pregnant throughRead MorePlato - Knowledge vs. True Belief Essay661 Words   |  3 Pagesresult, then true belief is no more useful than knowledge and both beneficial (Meno 97c). This comparison changes in book five of the Republic when Socrates says an ideal state must have a philosopher-king as a ruler (Republic 473d-e). Socrates and Glaucon conclude that knowledge and true belief are different powers so their natures cannot be the same (Republic 477c-478a). Knowledge is the most effective power, while true belief is only what enables you to believe. I think the most importantRead MoreThe Republic By Plato982 Words   |  4 PagesBook II of The Republic by Plato showcases the two very different views of Socrates and Glaucon in regards to the account of nature and origin of justice. Socrates and Glaucon discuss the theory presented by Glaucon that states that injustice is something that is intrinsically desired by all humans. Glaucon presents this argument to Socrates in order to understand and defend justice for its own sake. Glaucon seeks reassurance from Socrates that justice is not just only good for the positive consequencesRead MoreSocrates Plausible Case for Justice862 Words   |  4 Pagesfor justice. Socrates raised two main questions in the first two books of Plato’s Republic, what is justice? And why should we act justly? Thrasymachus and Glaucon both have different and more negative views of justice than Socrates. Throughout books one and two, Socrates, Glaucon and Thrasymachus go back and forth discussing the definition and application of justice in society. He starts his discussions with Glaucon and Thrasymachus by stating simply, â€Å"What is justice?† Thrasymachus states that

Construction Law Coursework Free Essays

Introduction This essay provides advice to Albatt plc (‘Albatt’), Budgett Technology Ltd (‘Budgett’) and Cansys Ltd (‘Cansys’) in relation to their legal positions concerning a contract for the service of Albatt’s electronic processors. Firstly, the advice shall briefly outline the relevant law before analysing the applicable law and advising each party separately. Relevant Law A Legally Binding Contract In English law, the traditional approach to determining whether or not a binding agreement has been entered into is to examine whether or not the following three elements are present: offer, acceptance and consideration (New Zealand Shipping Co. We will write a custom essay sample on Construction Law Coursework or any similar topic only for you Order Now Ltd v A M Satterthwaite and Co. Ltd). However, in the event that the above three elements are not clearly evident from the facts of the case, the intention to enter into a binding agreement shall be deduced by enquiring into the objective intention of the parties to enter into such an agreement by considering all the circumstances of a case: the offer, counter-offers, acceptances, revocations and rejections (Gibson v Manchester City Council). It is also noteworthy that an offer can be distinguished from an invitation to treat which arises where an individual is simply seeking to initiate negotiations as opposed to expressing an intention to be bound by their promise (Richards 2008, p 17). However, in any given case, the intention of the parties must be assessed before arriving at a decision as to whether or not there is an offer or invitation to treat (Chapelton v Barry UDC). The facts of this case would suggest that it involves an invitation for tenders. If that is the case, an invitation for tenders constitutes an invitation for offers to be submitted which can then be either accepted or rejected (Spencer v Harding). Albeit, it ought to be borne in mind that in certain circumstances, where a tender has been submitted in accordance with the applicable rules, an invitation to tender can amount to an offer, thereby providing a party with a right to have their tender opened and considered (Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council). In the case of the supply of services, the supplier whose bid is successful is making a standing offer which is accepted by the other party every time an order is placed. Further, in circumstances concerning standing orders, a supplier can refuse to supply the services before the expiry of the agreed period without being found guilty of breach of contract providing the revocation is communicated to the othe r party (Great Northern Railway Co. Witham). However, the existing orders must be honoured (Offord v Davies). An exception to the general rule that acceptance must be communicated to the other party (Powell v Lee) is the postal rule (Adams v Lindsell), which provides that acceptance takes place immediately once a letter has been validly posted (Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandelsgesellschaft GmbH). However, the postal rule can be negated where there is an indication from the offeror that they must receive acceptance before it shall bind them (Household Fire and Carriage Accident Insurance Co v Grant). Furthermore, in the case of forms of communication which are instantaneous, the acceptance occurs at the moment the communication is received by the other party (Entores v Miles Far East Corporation). Therefore, the position in general regarding instantaneous forms of communication is that the law in this regard seems to indicate that acceptance is effective on receipt. Finally, it is also worth noting that the terms of an offer must be unconditionally accepted otherwise any attempt to introduce new terms shall constitute a counter-offer (Hyde v Wrench). Advice to the Parties Analysis of the Law Albatt initially offered the contract for the service of their electronic processors to Budgett. The letter outlining this offer indicated that Budgett should reply by return of post. The case law in this instance suggests that a reply by post or an equally expeditious method will be acceptable (Tinn v Hoffman and Co). However, the letter did not reach Budgett until 6th September, due to an error in the address which was put on the letter. Nevertheless, Budgett did receive the letter on 6th September and, immediately upon receipt, accepted the offer and posted the acceptance letter at 11:00AM on the same day. According to the case law, the postal rule dictates that Budgett’s letter shall constitute an acceptance once it had been validly posted (Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandelsgesellschaft GmbH). However, Albatt had agreed by telephone to offer Cansys the contract on 5th September after not receiving any reply from Budgett, and Cansys duly accepted the offer. That said, Albatt did not send a notice of withdrawal of the original offer to Budgett until 6th September. This notice was sent by fax, which is an instantaneous form of communication (Entores v Miles Far East Corporation). A notice of withdrawal sent via this method shall become effective once it has been received if sent during office hours (The Brimnes). This is the case irrespective of whether or not the other party has had sight of the notice. The Legal Position of the Parties Albatt Albatt’s legal position revolves around the issue of when the fax setting out the notice of withdrawal was sent to Budgett. If it had been sent prior to 11:00AM, on 6th September, then it would appear that Albatt had not entered into a legally binding agreement with Budgett (The Brimnes). However, if the fax was sent after 11:00AM the issue would turn on when Budgett’s acceptance letter had been validly posted (Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandelsgesellschaft GmbH). If the letter was validly posted prior to the notice of withdrawal being received, Albatt will have entered into a contract with Budgett. If not, only the contract with Cansys will be valid. In light of the fact that the fax was received by Budgett at 10:30AM, no legally binding contract had been entered into between Albatt and Budgett (The Brimnes), irrespective of the fact that nobody read the fax until 5:00PM. Budgett Budgett’s legal position turns on the issue of when its letter of acceptance was validly posted, as set out above (Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandelsgesellschaft GmbH). If it the letter was validly posted before Albatt’s notice of withdrawal was received, Budgett can sue for breach of contract if Albatt does not honour the agreement. If the notice of withdrawal was sent outside normal business hours, however, it would not become effective until the following day (providing that this was a normal working day) (Mondial Shipping and Chartering BV v Astarte Shipping Ltd). It is noteworthy that a court would place much emphasis on the intention of the parties (Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandelsgesellschaft GmbH). However, given that Albatt’s fax was received by Budgett at 10:30AM on 6th September, a court would find that no contract had been entered into between the parties (The Brimnes). Nonetheless, Budgett may have a claim in neglige nce due to the mistake in the address put on the offer letter which was sent on 1st September and was directly responsible for the delay in Budgett’s acceptance being communicated to Albatt. Cansys Cansys communicated an offer to Albatt to do the servicing work on 4th September for ?160,000, per annum. However, the terms of an offer must be unconditionally accepted otherwise any attempt to introduce new terms shall constitute a counter-offer (Hyde v Wrench). Therefore, Albatt’s offer to give Cansys the contract for ?155,000, instead of ?160,000, would constitute a counter-offer which would negate the original offer. Nevertheless, Cansys accepted this offer and an agreement was struck between the parties. The facts of the case therefore indicate that Cansys entered into a legally binding contract with Albatt for the service of its electronic processors for the sum of ?155,000, per annum for five years on 5th September following a telephone conversation between the respective parties. Word Count: 1422 Bibliography Text Books Richards, P. (2008), Law of Contract, Eighth Edition, UK: Pearson Education Ltd Furmston, M. P., Cheshire, G. C. Fifoot, C. H. S. (2007), Chesire, Fifoot and Firmston’s Law of Contract, 15th Edn., USA: OUP Beale, Prof. H., Chitty on Contracts Volume 1: General Principles, UK: Sweet Maxwell Stone, R. (2011), The Modern Law of Contract, Ninth Edn., UK: Routledge Furmston, M., (2006), Powell-Smith and Furmston’s Building Contract Casebook, UK: Blackwell Publishing Case Law Adams v Lindsell (1818) 1 B Ald 681 Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council [1990] 3 All ER 25 Brinkibon Ltd v Stahag Stahl und Stahlwarenhandelsgesellschaft GmbH [1983] 2 AC 34 Chapelton v Barry UDC [1940] 1 KB 532 Entores v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 QB 327 Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 All ER 972 Household Fire and Carriage Accident Insurance Co v Grant (1879) 4 Ex D 216 Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334 Mondial Shipping and Chartering BV v Astarte Shipping Ltd [1995] CLC 1011 Offord v Davies (1862) 12 CBNS 748 Powell v Lee (1908) 99 LT 284 New Zealand Shipping Co. Ltd v A M Satterthwaite and Co. Ltd [1975] AC 154 Spencer v Harding (1870) LR 5 CP 561 The Brimnes [1975] QB 929 How to cite Construction Law Coursework, Essay examples

The American War of Independence free essay sample

The war ended with the Peace of Paris Nil 763 when France gave up Its lain to Canada and to all of North America and east of the Mississippi River. In 1765 the English Parliament passed another new law called the Stamp Act. It was intended to raise money to pay the defense of the colonies. It said that the colonies had to buy special tax stamps and attach them to newspapers, licenses and legal papers. Representatives from 9 colonies formed the Stamp Act Congress. They demanded representatives In the Brothels Parliament-No taxation without representation- became their demand.The Boston Tea Party was a direct action by colonists in Boston against he British government. On Deck. 16, 1 773 after officially in Boston refused to return 3 shiploads of taxed tea to Britain a group of colonists, disguised themselves as Meridians, loaded the ships and destroyed the tea by throwing it into Boston Harbor. In 1774, British warship took up position at the mouth of Boston Harbor to close It. We will write a custom essay sample on The American War of Independence or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page A few months later a group of colonial leaders came together In Philadelphia and formed the 1 Continental Congress to oppose British oppression.Fighting for independence On the night of April 8, 1775, British soldiers marched silently out of Boston to story weapons and ammunition that rebellions colonists had stored in Concord. But in the village of Lexington, 70 minutemen (members of the colonial partisan militia) were gathered to stop them. The 1st shot had been hired In the Americas War of Independence. In May, 1775 a 2nd Continental congress met In Philadelphia and set up an army of 17. 000 men under the command of George Washington. On July 4, it ensured the declaration of independence.The Declaration of Independence is the most important document in the American history. It was written by Thomas Jefferson. It claimed that all men had a natural right to life, living and the pursuit of happiness. It also said that governments can only justly claim the right to rule if they have the agreement of those they govern the consent of the governed. Jefferson combined John Locks Ideas with their own experience of life In America to produce a new definition of democratic government. This new definition said that governments should consist of representatives elected by the people.It also said that the main season that governments existed was to protect the rights of individual citizens. Washingtons army wasnt an effective fighting force, because few of the men had any military training. Success began to come to the Americans in Cot. 1777, when they trapped almost 6000 men of the British army at Saratoga, when the British French king Louis XVI signed an alliance with the Americans and sent French ships, soldiers and money to help them. In Swept. 1781 George Washington was heading a combined American and French army, which surrounded 8000 British troops atYorktown. On Cot. 17, 1781, General Cornwallis (British Army officer) surrendered his army to Washington. In the Treaty of Paris, which was signed in September 1783, Britain officially recognized her former colonies as an independent nation. The new republics first senate, House of Representatives, and president- George Washington took office in 1789. The Bill of Rights guaranteeing a range of legal protections was adopted in 1791. Years of Growth After 1783 more and more people set off for the new territories between theAppalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River that the Treaty of Paris had granted to the US. Meridians, who already lived on these lands saw the settlers as thieves who had come to steal their hunting grounds and made fierce attacks on them. In 1830 the US government passed a law called the Indian Removal Act. The law said that all Indians living east of the Mississippi River would be moved west. The Cherokees were driven from their homes and forced to march hundreds of miles on the so called Trail of Tears. By the time it was over 4000 of the Meridians were dead.